fig(compare): PD132T↔PD136HA 响应对比图（时域 + 延迟扫描）

Browse Source

- docs/img/response-compare-pd132t-pd136ha.{svg,png}，生成脚本 tools/plot_response_compare.py
- 面板A：CAPVD 阶梯响应（+0.5% 与 +0.15%）；面板B：检测延迟 vs Δf/f（对数扫描，含 τ 主导陡升段与阈值以下灰区）
- 数值：+0.5% ⇒ 10.9 vs 21.8 ms（窗长主导，2.0×）；+0.15% ⇒ 32.6 vs 152.3 ms（τ 主导，4.7×）；+0.10% ⇒ PD132T 76.2 ms / PD136HA 档1 检不到
- 落文档：pd132t-vs-pd136ha-comparison.md §5.5 新增；measurement-window-quantization.md §10 新增；README tools 补脚本
- 表格校验 0 异常（16 文件）

...

This commit is contained in:

wangfq

2026-09-11 11:15:09 +08:00

parent 91ed16a9b8

commit 9c88b1d7b0

6 changed files with 243 additions and 1 deletions

Show all changes Ignore whitespace when comparing lines Ignore changes in amount of whitespace Ignore changes in whitespace at EOL

Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files

docs/img/response-compare-pd132t-pd136ha.png

BIN

Binary file not shown.

Side by Side After Width:  |  Height:  |  Size: 190 KiB

docs/img/response-compare-pd132t-pd136ha.svg

+1

File diff suppressed because one or more lines are too long

Side by Side After Width:  |  Height:  |  Size: 22 KiB